Search for: All records

To make daily decisions, human agents devise their own "strategies" governing their mobility dynamics (e.g., taxi drivers have preferred working regions and times, and urban commuters have preferred routes and transit modes). Recent research such as generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL) demonstrates successes in learning human decision-making strategies from their behavior data using deep neural networks (DNNs), which can accurately mimic how humans behave in various scenarios, e.g., playing video games, etc. However, such DNN-based models are "black box" models in nature, making it hard to explain what knowledge the models have learned from human, and how the models make such decisions, which was not addressed in the literature of imitation learning. This paper addresses this research gap by proposing xGAIL, the first explainable generative adversarial imitation learning framework. The proposed xGAIL framework consists of two novel components, including Spatial Activation Maximization (SpatialAM) and Spatial Randomized Input Sampling Explanation (SpatialRISE), to extract both global and local knowledge from a well-trained GAIL model that explains how a human agent makes decisions. Especially, we take taxi drivers' passenger-seeking strategy as an example to validate the effectiveness of the proposed xGAIL framework. Our analysis on a large-scale real-world taxi trajectory data shows promising results from two aspects: i) global explainable knowledge of what nearby traffic condition impels a taxi driver to choose a particular direction to find the next passenger, and ii) local explainable knowledge of what key (sometimes hidden) factors a taxi driver considers when making a particular decision. 

Learning to make optimal decisions is a common yet complicated task. While computer agents can learn to make decisions by running reinforcement learning (RL), it remains unclear how human beings learn. In this paper, we perform the first data-driven case study on taxi drivers to validate whether humans mimic RL to learn. We categorize drivers into three groups based on their performance trends and analyze the correlations between human drivers and agents trained using RL. We discover that drivers that become more efficient at earning over time exhibit similar learning patterns to those of agents, whereas drivers that become less efficient tend to do the opposite. Our study (1) provides evidence that some human drivers do adapt RL when learning, (2) enhances the deep understanding of taxi drivers' learning strategies, (3) offers a guideline for taxi drivers to improve their earnings, and (4) develops a generic analytical framework to study and validate human learning strategies.